2023 Euthanasia Communication + Support Survey

This year, as euthanasia rates hit a 3-year high, animal welfare staff and volunteers are increasingly struggling with how euthanasia decisions are made and communicated, and are often unsure how to cope with or process feelings of anger, guilt, sadness, moral distress, and cumulative grief.

In the spring of 2023, while I was attending Animal Care Expo, the following questions came up repeatedly:  

  • How do we compassionately support our staff when they struggle with euthanasia AND hold them accountable for getting their job done?
  • What can we do to protect our decision-makers, who are often blamed and criticized by other staff and volunteers and are increasingly distressed and traumatized by this aspect of their job?

In response, I sent an informal survey to my newsletter subscribers asking:

  • What’s working well in your organization regarding the euthanasia decision-making process, communications, accountability for harmful behaviors, and effective support for staff distress?

The survey did not ask about euthanasia philosophies, numbers, trends, ethics, or methods. Respondents were instructed to share how they effectively discuss and communicate euthanasia decisions with staff and support staff.

The responses were deeply moving and I'm grateful to everyone who took time to answer the questions so thoughtfully and with tremendous compassion. 

Below you’ll find the survey questions, along with summaries of the responses, and a selection of direct quotes (click dropdown menus titled "In their own words.")

I’m not a researcher and the survey is far from scientific; but I hope that the community wisdom shared here can be of some benefit to anyone who is looking for ideas or guidance around one of the most complicated areas of our work with animals. 

Please note that some quotes were edited to remove identifying information or for length and clarity.

Who Participated In The Survey?

The majority of replies came from people working in animal shelters in the United States, as well as sanctuaries and foster-based rescues. 

Additionally, respondents worked in organizations in Canada, Thailand, and China. While the majority cared for dogs and cats, a few respondents also worked with wildlife, bears, and monkeys.

With a couple of exceptions, the euthanasia services discussed are NOT for animals owned by the public.

Half of respondents worked in organizations with 50 or fewer employees.

Q1: How many people are involved in the decision process and what are their roles?

The average group of decision-makers was approximately 4-6 ppl, but some organizations invite everyone to the table, while some have only one person making the decision. A few shared they have large, formal, structured committees or groups.  

The meetings to discuss outcomes are held at varying intervals: daily, weekly, biweekly, as needed, or when possible. 

The majority of respondents indicated that some or all of the following roles were typically part of the core decision-making group:

  • Representative from the leadership/executive team (such as ED, VP, etc.)
  • Director of Shelter (variations on the title: Director of Shelter Operations, Director of Operations)
  • Shelter Veterinarian (variations include Chief Medical Officer, etc.) or member of clinical team (i.e., vet tech or assistant)
  • Head of Behavior and Training or member of the behavior team
  • Animal Care Manager

Some of the other roles that were less frequently mentioned include Animal Control Officers, Foster Care Coordinators, Customer Service Managers, Volunteer Managers, Admissions, and Transport Coordinators.

Many respondents shared that animal care staff are asked to share input to aid the decision-making process. A few also invite volunteers who know the animals well into the discussion.

Q2: What’s the typical process for making the decisions?

The specifics of the decision-making process vary, however the majority used a dialogue-based process and reviewed information from multiple sources. Some respondents shared that the discussions could feel subjective or that the process wasn’t clear. Others felt that the discussion format worked well for their teams. 

A smaller percentage of organizations also used formal checklists or matrixes for decision-making.

In many cases, the decision must be unanimous.

Many noted that the type of case - medical or behavioral – determines who makes the decisions and the process might be shorter, with fewer participants and less discussion, when strictly medical as opposed to behavioral euthanasia which often involves more input and discussion from various depts, as well as a sign off by leadership.

Q3: If an individual disagrees with a decision that's being discussed, how are they instructed to voice their concerns?

The vast majority are instructed to reach out to their manager, supervisor, or director with concerns either in person, by text, or by email. The majority of respondents reported that discussion is welcome, however, if someone states opposition to euthanasia, a solution or plan with viable, safe alternatives that take quality of life into account must also be shared.

Many utilize internal shared documents and notes to include staff in a time-limited discussion period. A few respondents did share that there was no clear process and disagreement is not welcome.

Some shared that as their process has improved – through matrixes, increased transparency, and more effort and attempts at interventions - there are fewer issues with upset staff and/or volunteers. Many shared that when staff and volunteers trust and understand the process and perceive that those making the decisions have put in significant effort, the stress reactions decrease.

Q4: When decisions are made, how is that information communicated to other staff members? And to volunteers?

For example are they notified before the euthanasia, so they can say goodbye? Notified before their next shift, so they're not surprised the animal is gone?

After decisions are made, staff are typically notified in person, whenever possible, but also by email, Teams, etc. The goal is to provide a chance to say goodbye, as long as this does not prolong suffering for the animals, and/or to prevent surprises.

At this stage of communication, most reported that staff can no longer veto or discuss the decision. Sometimes additional info is shared in the staff notifications to help staff and volunteers to better understand the decision.

Volunteers are not typically notified in advance. When volunteers are notified, it’s usually because they are very involved with or attached to the animal. Methods for notification mentioned in the survey include an internal Facebook page, text messages, emails, meetings before shift, and a binder in the shelter. Foster parents typically receive notification in advance.  

Staff are frequently given 24-48 hours’ notice, occasionally 48-72 hours (if the situation is not emergent and suffering will not be prolonged), but not “too far” in advance to reduce emotional upset. In some organizations, staff who are on shift that day are notified in the morning about end-of-day euthanasia, and in other organizations, staff are instructed to self-monitor the euthanasia list, files, or shared documents.

In some cases, staff have the choice to opt-in if they want to receive these notifications, in other cases, staff automatically get notified due to their job role. If advanced notification was not possible, sometimes staff are notified by email afterward. 

Some organizations do not notify staff at all due to lack of resources or frequency of euthanasia. In these instances, exceptions were typically still made for staff “favorites.”

Q5: How are harmful, unproductive, or distressing behaviors addressed? 

For example if a staff member or volunteer is criticizing or blaming the person who made the decision, how are they held accountable? How do you address staff members who are highly distressed after every euthanasia?

The majority shared that they addressed the individual via private conversation to explain the decision-making process and the solutions attempted. Inappropriate, harmful behavior may be met with disciplinary action.

In most cases, challenging emotions are met with increased support. Support includes grief groups, debriefing, EAP, etc. (more on this in Q6). If an individual is consistently having trouble with euthanasia or the decision-making process, they may be moved to a different role or their employment or volunteer work may be terminated.  

Some survey participants shared that a lack of accountability for poor behavior (staff or volunteers) is a major source of stress and distress and a top reason they’re considering leaving their jobs.

Many noted that they discuss euthanasia and the decision-making process from day one with staff and/or volunteers to reduce surprises, contention, and distress later.

“You can be upset about the decision, but not at the people making it."

Q6: What kind of support is offered to staff immediately after euthanasia? And later?

For example can they take a break before moving on to their next task, debrief with a supervisor at the end of the day, etc.? Is there any grief support offered regularly? Do you honor/memorialize the animals in any way?

Almost all the respondents offer staff the option to say goodbye. Many allow staff the choice to be present or opt out of specific euthanasia to reduce distress for themselves or the animals. In some shelters, euthanasia is viewed as a medical procedure performed by clinic staff only, not animal care staff, to reduce distress.

The majority offered staff the option to take a break afterward, some are allowed to leave early for the day or take time off if needed. Many organizations intentionally schedule euthanasia for the end of the day, so staff can go home directly after, or right before lunch, so they have a built-in break.

Some offered the option to debrief informally afterward (i.e. chat in their office) or to attend a formal debriefing session run by in-house or external facilitators (offered at varying schedules: as-needed, monthly, quarterly). 

Many offer follow-up support in the form of free counseling sessions, often via an app or their Employee Assistance Program.

Most respondents offer staff the option to request mementos for animals they had a special bond with such as paw prints, fur clippings, ashes, collars, etc. A couple of respondents shared concerns regarding keeping mementos due to the potential volume and the impact this might have on an individual’s mental health.

A few shared that they pause after every euthanasia to honor the animal with simple rituals such as opening a window, saying a prayer, pausing for a moment of silence, or lighting a candle. A few create memorials for animals in the form of “rainbow bridge” boards with names and/or photos or through memorial gardens or stones outside of the shelter. A few shelters and sanctuaries organize individual memorials or rituals such as spreading ashes together or burying the animal in a sanctuary cemetery.

Respondents from larger organizations with daily euthanasia felt they had “too many to memorialize.” Some shared that they stopped doing memorials because it created more distress.

Q7: What else is important for me to know?

 “In every org I have worked in, leadership always matters most. Having leaders who set healthy boundaries on staff behavior AND are supportive, makes the world of difference to how teams cope. As does having a system for decision-making that staff trust.”

SUMMARY

How shelters, sanctuaries, and rescues make euthanasia decisions, and communicate those decisions with and support their staff and volunteers varies widely. The survey responses reflect the depth and complexity of this aspect of animal welfare work. 

However, there are some common themes in the responses of those who feel their organization’s approach has been effective in reducing harmful behaviors, stress, and distress:

  • Proactively create clear, expert-informed guidelines/criteria
  • Engage in regular meetings to discuss the needs of individual animals 
  • Welcome respectful, constructive discussion and disagreement
  • Communicate with staff consistently, transparently, and predictably regarding decisions made
  • Give staff autonomy regarding involvement in the euthanasia process (including the choice to be present or not, to say goodbye, memorialize, take breaks, etc.)
  • Support staff wellbeing through informal and formal debriefing, breaks, memorials, and/or mental health services
  • Validate strong emotions, without allowing emotional reactivity to harm others, and if consistently distressed, consider role change or termination
  • Hold individuals accountable for harmful behavior through conversations, education, clear expectations and boundaries, and disciplinary action when needed

 

In the future, I’ll share additional thoughts and my suggestions based on the survey. In the meantime, here are a few resources related to decision-making that may be of use:

If you have a resource related to euthanasia communications, accountability, or support that you think may be a helpful addition to this list, please email: [email protected]

  

DOWNLOAD THE INFOGRAPHIC HERE

 

Thank you again to everyone who completed the survey. I read everything you wrote many, many times and you have my deepest respect and appreciation. The hard-won wisdom that you shared will be of benefit to many others and it honors the animals you’ve helped transition. May we all find peace. - Jessica


 

For Additional Support and Education:

Jessica teaches the Compassion Fatigue Strategies, Plus! course for animal care and welfare professionals via The Shelter Medicine Program at UFL. The course offers 8 weeks of self-paced learning with live support from Jessica through live calls and discussion boards.

Join us to learn about empathic strain, moral distress, burnout, compassion satisfaction, and resilience, as well as how to reduce the impact of working in a complex stress, trauma-exposed field, so that you can be well while you do good work in the world. 

The next session starts February 26th, 2024. You can learn more and register here.